Comments on the proposed aquatics master plan
You may recall that a few months ago, an aquatics engineering consulting firm hired to create a 10-year aquatics master plan for Sioux Falls recommended building a large, indoor aquatics facility at Spellerberg Park within the next two to three years, citing its central location and size as the determining factors.
Estimated cost for the indoor facility would be about $18.5 million. The pool would draw more than 80,000 visitors a year and bring in an estimated $355,823 a year, according to the study.
A number of other suggestions came from the study, including: Maintaining family aquatic centers at current locations; maintaining the wading pool and spray park at McKennan and Pioneer parks, respectively; adding a sprayground to Frank Olson; and adding a medium-sized family aquatic center; all at a cost, during the next 10 years, of about $27.6 million.
The study, in its entirety, has become available to the City Council, and will be presented during the informational meeting tomorrow at 4 p.m. I’m not sure if there will be any new information presented, but I did take a gander at the study posted here, and it includes some comments given after the initial recommendations, and they’re pretty interesting. No names or affiliation with any groups are included in the comment.
City residents will get the opportunity to vote on a whether or not to replace the aging Spellerberg pool with a new outdoor pool next April, after petitioners got enough signatures to put the issue on the ballot.
Here’s some of the comments, broken down by category:
Need for Indoor
-Good Analysis! Bussing from FAC to indoor facility should be offered for inclement weather. Indoor pool is needed.
-Build it now! Build it at Spellerberg! It’s cold here we need an indoor year-round facility. Great presentation!
-Option #1 looks great. We really need a public indoor pool in Sioux Falls and we would love to see a 50m pool.
-I like the thought of an indoor aquatic center. I have young kids and it would be a great winter activity.
-Having young children and swim team members, I support an indoor aquatic center.
-This is a long time coming and hope it doesn’t take several more years to build. If you build it, they will come!
-We need an indoor pool in SF for a community pool and Spellerberg is the best location. Also, I think putting an 50m pool (outdoor) at Drake Springs would help. You would have an outdoor option for the swim teams and you could create extra revenue by keeping Drake open during meets and getting their siblings to utilize those pools.
- SF NEEDS an large indoor facility. Other communities are passing SD’s largest city by. SF should be a leader, not a bystander community. The economic impact for SF is huge!
-We need an indoor pool for competitive swimming.
-Let’s not be talking about an indoor aquatics center 10-15 years from now like we did with the events center. That would be a big mistake!
Spellerberg–FOR
-Lived in neighborhood of the VA for almost 27 years. Purchased (a home), married, raised a child, now an empty-nester. Thank you to SFPR for considering the Spellerberg site for a multi-million dollar infusion of much needed infrastructure and economic development in
my neighborhood.
-Please adopt Option #1! The “pie” will grow. Hopefully there will be resources to include other 50m pools indoor or outdoor. We have the need! Take the lead!
-Spellerberg’s central location is ideal for more usage by local and distant people.
-I appreciate the extensive study & consideration to aquatic facility needs, am happy to see Spellerberg considered for a more useful/useable indoor pool
-Our city needs this for all ages! A central location is logical & the space is available
-Let’s use it! Traffic will be spread out and not everyone is going to use the facility at one time.
AGAINST
- I’m afraid the large indoor is going to make that worse and not just in front of our rental, but also along the “tight” side of the street and the surrounding area. Please know we are for an indoor pool, but I just don’t agree with the location. Adding that facility there it’s
going to make it harder to cross Western and not just for our tenants, but for the kids that use that park who live east of Western.
-I support an indoor aquatics center, but oppose the proposed location at Spellerberg Park.
-Spellerberg Park is not the best location for the large aquatic center. It does not provide room for development around the new facility. I support a new aquatic center.
-Free land at Sanford! Federal contingencies on Spellerberg land. Parking at Spellerberg and surrounding area is already a huge problem considering the presence of VA Hospital, Children’s Care Hospital and School, Bethany Nursing Home and strip mall on 3 sides.
-The Spellerberg neighborhood does not have the infrastructure to handle heavier traffic.There are already traffic and parking problems.
There are many comments in the plan, so feel free to browse the rest of them at the link above.